Reviewer Comments:

Reviewer: 2

Recommendation: A - Publish Unaltered

Comments:
In the final version, it is suggested to place "related work" section after "introduction".

Additional Questions:
1. Is the topic appropriate for publication in these transactions?:

1. Is the topic appropriate for publication in these transactions?: Adequate Match

1. Is the paper technically sound?: Yes

2. How would you rate the technical novelty of the paper?: Novel Enough for Publication

Explain: This paper proposes a novel method for zero-shot domain generalization.

3. Is the contribution significant?: Moderately Significant

4. Is the coverage of the topic sufficiently comprehensive and balanced?: Treatment somewhat unbalanced, but not seriously so

5. Rate the Bibliography: Satisfactory

1. How would you rate the overall organization of the paper?: Satisfactory

2. Are the title and abstract satisfactory?: Yes

3. Is the length of the paper appropriate? If not, recommend what should be added or eliminated.: Yes

4. Are symbols, terms, and concepts adequately defined?: Yes

5. How do you rate the English usage?: Satisfactory


Reviewer: 1

Recommendation: A - Publish Unaltered

Comments:
The authors's response have been addressed all my concerns.

Additional Questions:
1. Is the topic appropriate for publication in these transactions?:

1. Is the topic appropriate for publication in these transactions?: Adequate Match

1. Is the paper technically sound?: Yes

2. How would you rate the technical novelty of the paper?: Novel Enough for Publication

Explain: Zero-shot learning is a criticial aspect for compter vision. In this paper, they propose a novel algorithm for zero-shot learning.

3. Is the contribution significant?: Significant

4. Is the coverage of the topic sufficiently comprehensive and balanced?: Yes

5. Rate the Bibliography: Satisfactory

1. How would you rate the overall organization of the paper?: Satisfactory

2. Are the title and abstract satisfactory?: Yes

3. Is the length of the paper appropriate? If not, recommend what should be added or eliminated.: Yes

4. Are symbols, terms, and concepts adequately defined?: Yes

5. How do you rate the English usage?: Satisfactory

=====