<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="paper.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>

<paper xmlns="http://www.cse.ucsd.edu/daniele/XML">

  <filename>uSVP-BDD</filename>

  <title>On Bounded Distance Decoding, Unique Shortest Vectors, 
    and the Minimum Distance Problem</title>
  
  <author>Vadim Lyubashevsky</author>
  <author>Daniele Micciancio</author>
  
  <reference>
    <conference>Advances in Cryptology</conference>
    <conf href="http://www.iacr.org/conferences/crypto2009/">CRYPTO 2009</conf>
    <address>Santa Barbara, CA, USA</address>
    <year>2009</year>
    <month>8</month>
  </reference>

  <abstract>
    <p xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">

      We prove the equivalence, up to a small polynomial approximation
      factor <em>(n/ log(n))<sup>0.5</sup></em>,
      of the lattice problems <strong>uSVP</strong> 
      (unique Shortest Vector Problem),
      <strong>BDD</strong> (Bounded Distance Decoding) and
      <strong>GapSVP</strong> 
      (the decision version of the Shortest Vector Problem).
      This
      resolves a long-standing open problem about the relationship
      between <strong>uSVP</strong> and the more standard 
      <strong>GapSVP</strong>, as well the
      <strong>BDD</strong> problem commonly used in coding theory.
      The main cryptographic application of our work is the proof that the
      Ajtai-Dwork [STOC 1997]
      and the Regev [J. ACM 51(6):899-942] cryptosystems,
      which were previously only known to be based on the hardness of
      <strong>uSVP</strong>, can be equivalently based on the hardness of
      worst-case <strong>GapSVP</strong><sub>O(n<sup>2.5</sup>)</sub> and 
      <strong>GapSVP</strong><sub>O(n<sup>2</sup>)</sub>,
      respectively.
      Also, in the case of <strong>uSVP</strong> and 
      <strong>BDD</strong>, our connection is very tight,
      establishing the equivalence 
      (within a small constant approximation factor)
      between the two most central problems used in lattice based
      public key cryptography and coding theory.
    </p>
  </abstract>
</paper>
