CSE 171: User Interface Design: Social and
1. Homework will not be graded, because there is no TA for this
course; but if the homework were graded, your grade would be strongly
influenced by your ability to use the concepts that you are (we hope!)
learning from the readings and lectures.
2. The homework is intended to be helpful to you in preparing for exams.
3. If you want feedback on your homework, please see me during my office
hours, which begin at 4:15 on Wednesday.
- Due 10 April:
- Select some interesting website and criticize its design, with respect
to meeting its goals. (You can find some interesting websites linked from my
"What's Cool" page, e.g., that of
Victoria Vesner, or items available by clicking on the walls of Timothy
Leary's house-like homepage.)
- Discuss Robert Morey's interactive applet proof of the Pythagorean Theorem. In
particular, explain why letting the user size the triangle is a good idea.
- Set up a webpage for your work on this course; write its URL on the
homework sheet and say what you want to achieve with its design. You will
then be graded on the quality of the design and to some extent the
appropriateness of the goals that you give. Do not include
information about solutions to homework problems!
- Find at least two inconsistencies in the old CSE 171 class website, at the design
level - not spelling, syntax, etc.
- Due 17 April:
- Use the "Eight Golden Rules" (pages 74-75 of Shneiderman) as a basis for
critiquing the websites that you discussed in questions 1 and 2 of last
- Write about one paragraph on the importance of a website designer (or
critic) knowing the goals of a site.
- (Optional:) In linguistics, mitigation is defined to be any use
of language that has the effect of decreasing the impact of a sentence. One
important class of mitigation devices are hedges, which are adjectives
and/or adverbs that decrease the impact of a noun or verb. Some examples are
"sort of", "sometimes", "possibly", "often", "maybe" and "perhaps". Some
other mitigation devices are syntactic, such as placing the main content in a
subordinate clause. List as many instances of mitigation as you can find in
the first paragraph of section 2.2.5 (page 60) of Shneiderman, and then
rewrite the paragraph without them. Draw a brief conclusion from this
- Due 24 April. The first three questions concern the UC San Diego Semiotic Zoo:
- Write a one paragraph statement of its goal;
- Write an interface guideline (capturing its current style); and
- Write a brief social impact statement for the zoo, following the
checklist on pages 113-114 of Shneiderman.
- Give an example of a single signifier in English that has two different
signifieds (or in Peircian terminology, a representamen that has two
different objects). Give an example showing how the signified can be changed
- (Optional) Write a semiotic analysis of the cover of the text by
Shneiderman, paying particular attention to the colors, sizes, backgrounds,
fonts, etc. of any text, and the structuring of this single complex sign as a
composition of smaller signs. Point out any instances of iconicity and
- Due 1 May:
- Make as many suggestions as you can for improving the Wireless Questionnaire, using material in Chapter 4 of
Shneiderman and the papers Communication and
Collaboration from a CSCW Perspective and Techniques for Requirements
- Give two real examples of mitigated speech from your own everyday life.
- The ordering of items in the readings and homework pages of the previous version of this course was reverse
chronological. Use semiotic morphisms to explain why that was not a good
idea - or why it was, if you think it was.
- (Optional) Write approximately one page comparing chapter 14 of
Shneiderman with Communication and Collaboration
from a CSCW Perspective by Mark Ackerman.
- Due 8 May:
- Give two examples of adjacency pairs (in the technical sense!) that might
occur in ordinary conversation, explain why they are examples, and give a
context in which they might occur. (Note: See section 6.2.1 of Techniques for Requirements
Elicitation. Your answer could be rather brief.)
- Apply the notion of adjacency pair to the Windows 2000 logout procedure.
- Do a heuristic evaluation (p.126 of Shneiderman) using the "Eight Golden
Rules" (p.74-76) and the 5 display organization guidelines (p.80) for the DTUI website; note that this should
include a consistency inspection (p.126).
- Explain in some detail how a scrollbar is a semiotic morphisms: what is
preserved, and what is not? Why? Consider also whether they should be
placed on the right or left of windows.
- Use CSCW ideas to explain the phenomenon (described p.197 of Shneiderman)
that users of computer games generally prefer a display of highest scores
over computer generated feedback during play.
- (Optional) Describe in some detail (e.g., who, when, where, why) an
example of recipient design that you actually observed in your own
experience; do not use a variant of the examples given in the class notes.
- Due 15 May:
- Give an example of a noticeable absence (in its technical sense!) in
natural social interaction, explain why it is an example, and give a context
in which it might appear. (Note: this can be brief.)
- Describe the structure of the simple narrative in the webpage The Structure of Narrative in the notation given
there. Also give an intuitive description of the semiotic morphism that maps
narratives to their Labov structures.
- Write about 1 page applying Shneiderman's ideas on user interfaces for
search capabilities in chapter 15 to the Yahoo! websearch engine.
- The first version of the popup explanation windows for the semiotic zoo
included all the same links as the exhibit pages themselves; however, I soon
deleted them. Explain why that was a good idea - or why it wasn't, if you
think it wasn't.
- Use semiotic morphisms to explain why it is usually better to
present a set of weblinks as a broad list rather than as tree with
non-trivial layering of indices (see p.575 of Shneiderman).
- (Optional) Find a new item that could have been used as an exhibit in the
UC San Diego Semiotic Zoo; put it on
your class website with an explanation, and give its URL.
- (Optional) Give a careful discussion of the list of problems with video
on p.491 of Shneiderman, paying careful attention to the fact that the list
contains items of completely different character, for example, that some
items have a social origin, whole others merely reflect short term limits of
current technology. Explain why each item might be a problem.
- Due 22 May:
- Early versions of the class webpages used "<hr>" to separate each link
at the bottom of each page, but now "<br>" is used instead (but not before
the first link or after the last). Use semiotic morphisms to explain why
that is a good idea - or why it isn't, if you think it isn't.
- Modify the code in this link as
described there; hand in printed copies of your XML source, your XSL source,
your DDT source, and the output that is produced. You will need to use
Internet Explorer version 5 for this assignment, since Netscape Navigator
does not yet support XML.
- Write one paragraph discussing how an XSL file defines a semiotic
morphism for XML code written in its style. You should use the above XML
homework problem as an example.
- Write a paragraph or so explaining how Andersen's notion of
manifestation can be seen as a semiotic morphism; give a simple
example, and describe what should be preserved.
- (Optional) Use semiotics to explain why some features of scrollbars work
well and others do not, expanding and making more precise the discussion
given in class.
- (Optional) Use both classical and algebraic semiotics to explain why some
things work and others do not in the "plumbing" representation of Figure
15.18, page 543, of Shneiderman (see the semiotic
methodology in Section 7 of the class notes).
- Due 29 May:
The OBJ3 Survival
Guide may be useful for the OBJ problems.
- Explain how the display in Plate B4a of Shneiderman (after page 514)
could be seen as a semiotic morphism. Do the same for Plate B5, and then
explain why it is better than B4a (if it is).
- Describe in detail your actions in trying to answer three simple but
non-trivial questions using a web browser; these questions should be similar
to those discussed in class. Say whether your search breadth first, depth
first, or neither, and whether it was adaptive. (One of the examples
discussed in class was to find the date of birth of Galileo Galilei.)
- Pick 3 from the list of 50 oxymorons, and explain
their oxymoronic meaning as a blend of semiotic morphisms for their two
parts. Because these are jokes, they are also supposed to have at least one
non-oxymoronic blend; both blends should be explained (if they exist).
- (Optional) Write the structure in the DTD for
bibliographic entities in OBJ, and test run this code on some simple
- (Optional) Write the other two blends described in the Formal Notation for Conceptual Blending in OBJ, and run the
code in order to type check it.
- Due 5 June:
- Write about one page using semiotics, especially morphisms, blends, and
iconicity, to analyze some specific everyday object, such as a
favorite coffee mug, chair, or table (see the semiotic methodology in Section 7 of the class notes).
- Write a short description of some major actants involved with XML
(including potential users and actants in the standards process) and some of
the most important relations among them. Draw a graph summarizing your
- Pick 3 cartoons from the set handed out in class on 8 March and explain
for each how some conceptual space has been recontextualized by adding
new information, and show how the resulting new meaning is a blend (give and
fill in the most pertinent parts of the blend diagram). If you prefer, you
may also choose cartoons from the comics section of a newspaper.
- Write an outline of the most important points in this class, with an
explaination of the relevance of each one to user interface design.
To CSE 171 homepage
Maintained by Joseph Goguen
© 2000, 2001 Joseph Goguen, all rights reserved
Last modified: Tue May 29 10:48:32 PDT 2001